AXIS Observing Run Report -------------------------- Dates Oct 27, 28 2000 Instrument WFC imaging at INT prime focus Observers Diana Worrall (U. Bristol) and Gyula Szokoly (AIP) Filters z(GUNN) i'(SDSS) r'(SDSS) Ha(narrowband) g'(SDSS) u(RGO) Nominal exps 1200 1200 600 1200 600 1200 Nom Landolt exps 60 30 20 120 15 120 Observing conditions Both nights clear and dark. On Oct 27th the humidity and seeing rose dramatically during first half of night, peaking soon after midnight and then improving towards dawn. Seeing between 1 arcsec and 1.4 arcsec. On Oct 28th the humidity stayed low, but the air was very unstable and the seeing dreadful (3 to 5 arcsec for much of the night, when winds were southerly). No time lost due to technical problems. Targets Observed ----------------- Name Filters Comments Oct 27th S5_0014+813 z i r High dec target. Airmass ~1.7, but not going to improve with time. (See summary.) HD_108 g deteriorating seeing. g missing from earlier observations. * EQ_Peg r g u u,g,r missing from earlier observations * CL0016+16 u seeing ~1.5''. u missing from earlier observations. * A399 r g u 800s in g. Seeing ~1.4''. u,g,r missing from earlier observations. ** HD_33798 z i r Ha g u seeing particularly good for Ha (sub-arcsec) and g. Started slightly earlier than optimal (airmass 1.5(z) - 1.2(u)) since bunch of high-priority targets at end of night. * Hawaii_167 z i r g u subarcsec seeing for z,i,r ** GL_182 z i r g u subarcsec seeing for i ** GRB001025 r 900s exposure to match WFS/WCF observation of Simon Hodgkin during prev night. New GRB observed by XMM in schedule change. ** Cl0939+472 i r g Oct 28th + PB5062 z i r g seeing deteriorated to several arcsec. g repeated. z ~ 1.3''; i ~ 1.8''; r and g 3'' to 5'' + LBQS221 i 2400s. seeing several arcsec. i and u were missing from earlier observations + A2670 g 2400s. seeing still bad. g and u were missing from earlier observations + NGC7770 i r g seeing improved to 2.5''! r 1200s; g 1800s. * HCG16 r g r 1800s; g 2400s seeing ~4''. r,g,u missing from earlier observations MBM12 i r r 1800s; i 2400s * geminga i r g r 900s; i 2400s; g 900s. Seeing improved to ~1.6'' * 0738+313 i r g r 900s; i 1500s ** Cl0939+472 z ** GRB001025 z i ** Priority A * Priority B + Early-night target added to list for 2nd night Unless otherwise noted the nominal exposure time was used Calibrations ---------- It takes good planning to fit in all the required sky flats. The automatic programme for calculating exposure times is not always satisfactory, particularly when the light gradient is large. We found that the best filter order for the flats is Halpha, u, g, r, z, i in the evening (and the reverse in the morning). For some flats, the FITS file header 'name' string typed manually, e.g. 'sky flat u', has the wrong filter by mistake, but there is a correct filter keyword written by the system, and the observing log is correct. The exposures for standards given above seemed to be good. The g, r, and i integration times are a little shorter than in the report for Oct 7/8th, to reduce saturation. Summary -------- Oct 27th was first good night after several during which the clouds had risen and engulfed the telescope in fog. We concentrated on getting good coverage of the priority A targets, although the gamma-ray burst field and Cl0939+472 were both only available approaching twilight. The lists provided had a shortage of low-airmass targets for early in the night, and there was insufficient time to correct this until night 2. The observations completed filter coverage of HD_108 (missing u but at b=1.25), EQ_Peg, CL0016+16, A399, HD_33798, Hawaii_167, and GL_182. Oct 28th was a great disappointment -- despite being cloud-free the air was unstable and the seeing mostly several arcsec. We increased integration times (but not beyond 2400s), used a restricted set of filters (no u-band), and gave high priority to critical missing filters from earlier runs as long as they weren't u. Data were deposited by ftp to ifca, starting during the night and completing during the following day. Transfer time and data acquisition time are comparable for a night's observing.